Отправлено: 16.01.14 11:51. Заголовок: Из интересного мне Статьи В.А.Мурцовкина и C.М.Аксельрода

В. А. Мурцовкин
ООО “Нефтегaзгеофизикa”

ПРИМЕРЫ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЯ КАПИЛЛЯРНО-РЕШЕТОЧНОЙ МОДЕЛИ ГОРНЫХ ПОРОД С ДВУХФАЗНЫМ НАСЫЩЕНИЕМ ДЛЯ РАСЧЕТА ИХ ПЕТРОФИЗИЧЕСКИХ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИК

Представлены результаты моделирования процессов электропроводности и фильтрации в пористых горных породах с двухфазным насыщением. В качестве модели породы использовалась трехмерная кубическая решетка из капилляров. Размеры и количество капилляров в такой модели подбираются в соответствии с заданным распределением пор по размерам. Полученные результаты позволяют установить общие закономерности влияния структуры пор на процессы переноса при двухфазной насыщенности, проанализировать зависимость электропроводности и фильтрации от особенностей насыщения породы флюидами и иллюстрируют возможности капиллярно-решеточной модели для описания свойств пористых сред с двухфазным насыщением.
Ключевые слова: моделирование, электропроводность, горная порода, фильтрация, параметр насыщенности, фазовая проницаемость, остаточная насыщенность.

Литература
1. Коатес Д. Р., Хиао Л. Ч., Праммер М. Д. Каротаж ЯМР. Принципы и применение. Хьюстон: Халибартон, 2001.
2. Мурцовкин В. А. Примеры использования капиллярно-решеточной модели для расчета петрофизических характеристик горных пород // НТВ “Каротажник”. Тверь: Изд. АИС. 2013. Вып. 3 (225). С. 177–192.
3. Мурцовкин В. А. Электропроводность пористых сред с двухфазным насыщением // Коллоидный журнал. 2013. Т. 75. № 1. С. 109–117.
4. Мурцовкин В. А. Мультирешеточная модель для расчета характеристик пористых сред. Расчет электропроводности // Коллоидный журнал. 2009. Т. 71. № 5. С. 677–684.
5. Мурцовкин В. А., Зеленов А. С. Расчет электропроводности и проницаемости горных пород по данным ядерно-магнитного каротажа // НТВ “Каротажник”. Тверь: Изд. АИС. 2006. Вып. 2–4. С. 108–120.
6. Мурцовкин В. А. Использование мультирешеточной капиллярной модели для расчета проницаемости по данным ядерно-магнитного резонанса // Коллоидный журнал. 2009. Т. 71. № 5. С. 685–692.
7. Тиаб Д., Доналдсон Э. Ч. Петрофизика: теория и практика изучения коллекторских свойств горных пород и движения пластовых флюидов. М.: ООО “Премиум Инжиниринг”, 2009.
8. Brownstein K. R., Tarr C. E. Importance of Classical Diffusion in NMR Studies of Water in Biological Cells // Phys. Rev. A. 1979. V. 19. № 6. P. 2446–2453.
9. Dunn K.-J., Bergman D. J., LaTorraca G. A. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Petrophysical and Logging Applications. Pergamon, 2002.



С. М. Аксельрод

ДОБЫЧА СЛАНЦЕВОЙ НЕФТИ: СОСТОЯНИЕ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ (ПО МАТЕРИАЛАМ ЗАРУБЕЖНОЙ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ)

Рассмотрены проблемы добычи сланцевой нефти. Приводится существующая оценка мировых запасов нефти в глинистых сланцах, описываются применяемые и проектируемые технологии добычи нефти из этих отложений. Рассмотрены геофизические и петрофизические методы выявления и оценки продуктивности коллекторов сланцевой нефти. Обсуждены экономические и экологические факторы, определяющие рентабельность разработки нетрадиционных источников нефти.
Ключевые слова: нефтесодержащие и горючие сланцы, внутрипластовая перегонка, керн, каротаж, шлам, бурение, гидроразрыв, продуктивность.

Литература
1. Allix P., Burnham A., Fowler T., Herron M., Kleinberg R., Symington B. Coaxing Oil from Shale. Schlumberger Oilfield Review. Winter 2010/2011. P. 4–16.
2. Alfred D., Vernik L. A New Petrophysical Model for Organic Shales. SPWLA 53rd Annual Logging Symposium. June 16–20, 2012. Paper A.
3. Andrews A. Oil Shale: History, Incentives, and Policy. Report for Congress. April 13, 2006. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33359.pdf.
4. Balouga J. Unconventional Oils:21st Century Rescuer? International Association of Energy Economics. November 4, 2012. P. 27–31. http://www.google.com/search?source = ig&rlz = &q = Unconventional+Oils%3A21st+Century+Rescuer%3F&oq = &gs_l =
5. Bartis T. J. et al. Oil Shale Development in the United States. RAND Corp. 2005. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2005/RAND_MG414.pdf.
6. Beckwith R. The Tantalizing Promise of Oil Shale, Journal of Petroleum Technology, January, 2012. On-line issue. http://www.spe.org/jpt/print/archives/2012/
01/10OilShales.pdf.
7. Bostrom N. et al. Realistic Oil Shale Pyrolysis Programs: Kinetics and Quantitative Analysis. Presented at the 29th Oil Shale Symposium. Colorado, October 19–21, 2009.
8. Boyer R. et al. SPE 160160, Production Array Logs in Bakken Horizontal Shale Play Reveal Unique Performance Based on Completion Technique. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. San Antonio, Texas, USA, 8–10 October, 2012.
9. Bullis K. Shale Oil Will Boost U.S. Production, but it Won’t Bring Energy Independence. MIT Technology Review, November 15, 2012. file:///D:/My%20Documents/Shale%20oil/Fracking%20and%20Shale%20Oil%20Won%E2%80%99t%20Lead%20to%20U.S.%20Energy%20Independence%20_%20MIT%20Technology%20Review.htm.
10. Burnham A. K. Slow Radio-Frequency Processing of Large Oil Shale Volumes to Produce Petroleum-like Shale Oil. U.S. Department of Energy, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. August, 2003. https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/243505.pdf.
11. Crain E. R., Eng P. Crain’s Petrophysical Handbook. 2000. http://www.spec2000.net/17-specshoil.htm.
12. Crane F. What Do the Oil Shale Plays Really Mean? Energyocm, on-line issue. April 2012. http://energyocm.wordpress.com/2012/04/20/what-do-the-shale-plays-really-mean/.
13. Denney D. Evaluating Production-Log Data from Horizontal Organic-Shale Wells. Journal of Petroleum Technology. March, 2012.
14. Denning D. Oil Shale Reserves. The Daily Reckoning. On-line issue, 2012. http://dailyreckoning.com/oil-shale-reserves/.
15. Dyni J. R. Geology and Resources of Some World Oil Shale Deposits. U.S. Geology Survey. Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5294. June 2006. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2005/5294/pdf/sir5294_508.pdf.
16. Gale B. et al. NPC North American Resource Development Study. Paper № 2–27. North American Oil and Gas Play Types. September 2011. On-line issue. http://www.npc.org/Prudent_Development-Topic_Papers/2-27_NA_Oil_and_Gas_Play_Types_Paper.pdf.
17. Grau J. A., Herron M. M., Herron S. L., Kleinberg R., Machlus M., Burnham A., Allix P. Organic Carbon Content of the Green River Oil Shale from Nuclear Spectroscopy Logs. Presented at the 30th Oil Shale Symposium, Colorado, October 18–22, 2010.
18. Gue E. The Difference between Oil Shale and Shale Oil. The Energy Report. On-line issue. November 2010. http://www.theenergyreport.com/pub/na/7813.
19. Gue E. The Difference between Oil Shale and Shale Oil. Seeking Alpha. On-line issue, 2009. http://seekingalpha.com/175771-the-difference-between-oil-shale-and-shale-oil.
20. Gue E. Oil Shale, Shale Oil, and 6 Ways to Play the Difference. Seeking Alpha. On-line issue, November 2010. http://seekingalpha.com/article/235257-oil-shale-shale-oil-and-6-ways-to-play-the-difference.
21. Hamilton J. Shale Oil and Tight Oil. Econbrowser. On-line issue, July 11, 2012. http://wwweconbrowser.com/archieves/2012/07/sgale_oil_and_ t.html.
22. Heddleston D. SPE 120591. Horizontal Well Production Logging Deployment and Measurement Techniques for US Land Shale Hydrocarbon Plays. SPE Production and Operations Symposium. Oklahoma, USA, 4–8 April, 2009.
23. Herron M. M. et al. Total Organic Carbon and Formation Evaluation with Wireline Logs in the Green River Oil Shale. SPE 147184, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Denver, Colorado, 30 October – 2 November, 2011.
24. Johnson R. C., Tracy J., Brownfield M. E. Assessment of In-Place Oil Shale Resources of the Green River Formation, Great Green River Basin in Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah. U.S. Geology Survey Fact Sheet 2011–3063. www.usgs.gov/fs/2011/3063/pdf/FS11-3063.pdf.
25. Kleinberg R. et al. Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements. Schlumberger on-line brochure. www.costar-mines.org/oss/30/presentation/Presentation_09-4-Kleinberg_Robert.pdf, 2009.
26. Likvern R. Is Shale Oil Production from Bakken Headed for a Run with “The Red Queen”? Oil Drum, on-line issue, September 25, 2012. File:///D:/My%20Documents/Shale%20oil/9506.htm.
27. Musharfi N., Almarzooq A., Eid M., Quirein J, Witkovsky J., Buller D., Rouk M., Truax J., Praznik G. Combining Wireline Geochemical, NMR, and Dielectric Data for Formation Evaluation and Characterization of Shale Reservoirs. SPWLA 53rd Annual Logging Symposium. June 16–20, 2012. Paper J.
28. Maugeri L. Oil: the Next Revolution, the Unprecedented Upsurge of Oil Production and What it Means for the World. Discussion Paper № 2012-10. Geopolitics of Energy Project. On-line issue, June 2012. http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/22144/oil.html.
29. Muerer W. P. et al. ExxonMobil’s Electrofrac Process and Parametric Controls on the Composition of Oil Generated by In Situ Pyrolysis of Oil Shale. www.ceri-miners.org/documents/28thsymposium/presentations08/PRESS_3-1_meurer-William.pdf.
30. Neville T. Shale Reservoirs: Effective Evaluation for Optimal Completion. Schlumberger on-line issue. August, 2012. https://www.fesaus.org/webcast/2012/08/TNeville/1208_TNeville_FESAus_Presentation.pdf.
31. Oil Shale & Tar Sands Programmatic EIS. About Oil Shale. On-line issue, 2012. http://ostseis.anl.gov/guide/oilshale/index.cfm.
32. Pan Y., Chen C., Yang Sh., Ma G. Development of Radio Frequency Heating Technology for Shale Oil Extraction. Open Journal of Applied Sciences (China). 2012. V. 2. P. 66–69.
33. Pedersen P. K., Clarkson C. Categorization of Unconventional Tight Light Oil Plays of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Department of Science, University of Calgary. 2012.
34. Quirein J., Murphy E., Praznik G., Witkovsky J., Shannon S., Buller Dan. A Comparison of Core and Well Log Data to Evaluate Porosity, TOC, and Hydrocarbon Volume in the Eagle Ford Shale. SPE 159904, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. San Antonio, Taxes, 8–10 October, 2012.
35. Radtke R. J. et al. Schlumberger. A New Capture and Inelastic Spectroscopy Tool Takes Geochemical Logging to the Next Level. SPWLA 53rd Annual Logging Symposium. June 16–20, 2012. Paper AAA.
36. Ramakrishna S., Merkel D., Balliet R. Mineralogy, Porosity, and Fluid Property Determination of Oil Reservoirs of the Green River Formation in Unita Basin. SPWLA 53th Annual Symposium. June 15–20, 2012. Paper K.
37. Ramakrishna S., Balliet R., Miller D., Sarvotham S., Merkel D. Formation Evaluation in the Bakken Complex Using Laboratory Core Data and Advanced Logging Technologies. SPWLA 51st Annual Symposium. June 19–23, 2010. Paper DDDD.
38. Raytheon. Radio Frequency/Critical Fluid Oil Extraction Technology. On-line issue, 2006. http://www.raytheon.com/businesses/rids/products/rtnwcm/groups/public/documents/content/rtn_bus_ids_prod_rfcf_pdf.pdf.
39. Rembrandt K. Shale Oil: the Latest Insights. Energy Bulletin, on-line issue. October 2012. http://www.energybulletin.net/stories/2012-10-26/shale-oil-the-latest-insights.html.
40. Seleznev N. V., Klejberg R. L., Herron M. M., Machlus M., Pomerantz A. E., Reeder S. L., Burnham A. K., Day R. L., Allix P. C. Application of Dielectric Dispersion Logging to Oil Shale Reservoirs. SRWLA 52nd Annual Logging Symposium. May 14–18, 2011. Paper G.
41. Schlumberger. Case Study: Advanced Logging Technology Reveals the Most Productive Zones in Woodford Shale Wells. On-line issue, Jan. 2013. http://www.slb.com/resources/case_studies/technical_challenges/unconventional_gas/shale_gas/advanced_logging_woodford_shale.aspx.
42. Schlumberger. Mississippian Shale Seismic Reservoir Characterization Improves Gas Production. On-line issue, 2010. http://www.slb.com/~/media/Files/industry_challenges/unconventional_gas/case_studies/seismic_characterization_mississippian_shale.
43. Schlumberger. LithoScanner Accurate TOC Determination for Unconventional Reservoirs. On-line issue, 2012. http://www.slb.com/~/media/Files/evaluation/case_studies/lithoscanner_standalone_cs.pdf.
44. Schlumberger. NeoScope LWD Service Delivers High-Quality Formation Evaluation Data for Apache. On-line issue. http://www.slb.com/~/media/Files/drilling/case_studies/neoscope_apache_egypt_cs.pdf.
45. Skelt C. Petrophysical Analysis of the Green River Formation, Southwestern Colorado – a Case Study in Oil Shale Formation Evaluation. SRWLA 51st Annual Logging Symposium. June 19–23, 2010. Paper EEEE.
46. Snow R. H. In-Situ Thermal Upgrading of Bitumen aнd Shale Oil by RF Electrical Heating. SPE 150694, SPE Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition, 124 December, Kuwait. 2011.
47. Symington W. A., Olgaard D. L., Otten G. A., Phillips T. C., Thomas M. M., Yeakel J. D. ExxonMobil’s Electrofrac™ Process for In Situ Oil Shale Conversion. AAPG Annual Convention & Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, April 21, 2008. http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2008/08131symington/ndx_symington.pdf.
48. Symington W. A. et al. Field Testing of ElectrofracTM Process Elements at ExxonMobil’s Colony Mine. 29th Oil Shale Symposium, October 19–23, 2009. http://www.ceri-mines.org/documents/29thsymposium/papers09/Paper_03-4_Symington-Bill.pdf.
49. Tonner D., Hughes S., Dix M. Welsite Geochemistry – New Analytical Tool Used to Evaluate Unconventional Reservoirs to Assist in Well Construction and Smart Completion. SPWLA 53rd Annual Logging Symposium. June 16–20, 2012. Paper H.
50. U.S. Department of Energy. Review of Emerging Resources: U.S. Shale Gas and Shale Oil Plays. On-line issue, July 2011. ftp://ftp.eia.doe.gov/natgas/usshaleplays.pdf.
51. US Shale Oil Special Report. ARGUS. On-line issue, 2012. www.argusmedia.com. http://www.argusmedia.com/Petroleum/Crude/~/media/Files/PDFs/Mkting/Argus%20US%20Shale%20Oil%20Special%20Report.ashx.
52. Warlick D. 7 Shale Plays Currently Driving US Drilling and Development. Oil & Gas Financial Journal. August, 2012. http://www.ogfj.com/articles/print/volume-9/issue-8/features/7-shale-plays-currently-driving.html.
53. Weisenthal J. Analyst Makes Bombshell Prediction of $50 Oil, and More Production than We Could Possibly Know What to Do with. Business Insider. On-line Issue. Dec. 1, 2012. http://www.businessinsider.com/how-surging-shale-production-could-bring-oil-prices-down-to-50-per-barrel-2012-12.